Category Archives: Allie Overstreet

Friend of Allie Overstreet, Michelle Stilipec, files a Better Business Bureau Complaint against Bill Windsor’s son’s company that is nothing but libel, slander, defamation, lies, threats, and stalking

Oregon-Portland-Michelle-Stillipec-Lawless-America-Movie-2013-01-04 022-640w

Friend of Allie Overstreet, Michelle Stilipec, files a Better Business Bureau Complaint against Bill Windsor’s son’s company that is nothing but libel, slander, defamation, lies, threats, and stalking

Here is a Better Business Bureau complaint that this outrageous cyberstalker has filed against my son’s company, an entity that is not now and never has been involved with my Lawless America project.

Here’s what she filed, filled with libel, defamation, and more:

Online Harassment. They have purchased a website in my name although I have never done business with them. My friends and I have reported the fraudulent business practices of Bill Windsor and his scam company, Lawless America. Bill is the father of Ryan Windsor, the head of Alacatraz Media. As retaliation, Bill is suing and stalking anyone who speaks up, as is our right. On June 4, 2013, using the Alcatraz Media Company name, Bill purchased website domains in the names of his victims, he is now creating horrible websites listing our names, pictures, contact info, pictures of our houses that he himself has stalked us to get, and claims we are criminals who have made slanderous remarks and death threats about him. The intention is to harass us and he claims that he will sue us until we are bankrupt and has indicated that he is doing background checks on us and wants to collect damages us from us to finance his fake company, Lawless America. However the websites themselves were purchased under the name of Alcatraz Media, a company none of us has done business with EVER, unless Lawless America is a scam by the whole family rather than just the father, Bill. Please and thank you for looking into this for us. The proof of this is here:http://www.dailychanges.com/alcatrazmedia.com/2013-06-05/

You can click on the Sean B**shie, or Allie Overstreet website to see that he is using these sites to harass us and says that he is a member of the media and that we are not allowed to read the websites and that if we do that he considers is stalking. Ryan Windsor has told us that Bill is extremely mentally ill and that he left home because they staged a failed intervention. And now Bill is using the family company to stalk and harass us all. Resolution: We don’t want money from this particular issue. We just want to harassing websites taken down. Unfortunately Bill Windsor has been declared a vexatious litigant and is not allowed to sue anyone without first obtaining permission from the court. He is stalking us and harassing us with the desires that we sue him, so that he can have access to the courts and use the courts to stalk us and collect damages. What the lawsuits will amount to and how much the family will be responsible for allowing an extremely mentally ill man to use their company to harass others is up for the courts to decide. We are simply requesting that the BBB be aware that that the company is allowing this abuse and illegal activity. And we thank you for your time if there is anything you can do to help us with this situation.

When time permits, I will set up www.MichelleStilipec.com to expose this woman for the criminal that I believe she is. She’s a friend of Allie Overstreet.

Michele-Stillipec-BBB-Complaint

Proof of the fundamental lie in her so-called Complaint; this shows the ownership of the domain that is available to anyone with a simple WHOIS search online:

MICHELLE-STILIPEC-7-9-2013 2-28-52 PM

MICHELLE-STILIPEC-7-9-2013 2-29-29 PM

Here is the Complaint as it appears on the Better Business Bureau – BBB – website:

MICHELLE-STILIPEC-BBB-7-9-2013 3-17-09 PM

MICHELLE-STILIPEC-BBB-7-9-2013 3-18-11 PM

MICHELLE-STILIPEC-BBB-7-9-2013 3-18-41 PM

MICHELLE-STILIPEC-BBB-7-9-2013 3-19-09 PM

Bill Windsor files Response to Motion Dismiss that was filed by Allie Overstreet

2013-04-08-Missouri-Lexington-Overstreet-Hearing-bill-preparing-2-640w

Bill Windsor files Response to Motion Dismiss that was filed by Allie Overstreet.

  1. By filing an ANSWER 30 days after the VERIFIED COMPLAINT was filed but not filing a MOTION TO DISMISS until 35 days after the VERIFIED COMPLAINT was filed, DEFENDANT OVERSTREET lost the right to seek a dismissal. “…a motion to dismiss is made before the filing of an answer….” (In re Marriage of Busch, 310 S.W.3d 253 (Mo.App. E.D. 04/27/2010).)   Rule 55.27 provides that the filing of a motion to dismiss is to be before filing an answer. (State of Missouri v. Bonacker, 791 S.W.2d 494, (June 20, 1990).)  Rule 55.27 says: “a motion making any of these defenses shall be made: (A) Within the time allowed for responding to the opposing party’s pleading….”  30 days was the time allowed, and 35 days was too late.
  2. Local Rule 21.2 requires that attorneys file an Entry of Appearance.  No such Entry of Appearance has been served on the PLAINTIFF, and no such Entry of Appearance is shown on the Court Docket.
  3. Pursuant to Local Rule 21.2, PLAINTIFF asks that this MOTION purportedly on behalf of DEFENDANT OVERSTREET by Matthew J. O’Connor or the O’Connor Law Firm be stricken due to the fact that Matthew J. O’Connor and the O’Connor Law Firm failed to file an appearance and cannot be recognized by this Court.
  4. The purported MOTION TO DISMISS claims RSMo. § 508.010 requires that the Plaintiff must bring an action where the tort or injury occurred.  This is false.  This attorney has clearly misrepresented to this Court what the law reads.
  5. There is no such provision in RSMo. § 508.010.  RSMo. § 508.010 clearly provides “If the defendant is an individual, then venue shall be in any county of the individual defendant’s principal place of residence in the state of Missouri.”
  6. RSMo. § 508.010 (4) provides “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in all actions in which there is any count alleging a tort and in which the plaintiff was first injured in the state of Missouri, venue shall be in the county where the plaintiff was first injured by the wrongful acts or negligent conduct alleged in the action.”
  7. RSMo. § 508.010 (8) provides that “In any action for defamation or for invasion of privacy, the plaintiff shall be considered first injured in the county in which the defamation or invasion was first published.”   In this action, there is defamation, and the county where the defamation was first published is Lafayette County Missouri.
  8. RSMo. § 508.010 (14) provides that “A plaintiff is considered first injured where the trauma or exposure occurred rather than where symptoms are first manifested.”  In this action, this is Missouri.  The VERIFIED COMPLAINT indicates that the first known defamation was “On or about February 20, 2013, Overstreet began communicating to the Plaintiff’s supporters that she had been ‘banned from Lawless America.’”  This was a message that came from Lexington County Missouri.  On February 21, 2013, the PLAINTIFF believes DEFENDANT OVERSTREET began sending emails and posting messages designed to trick the PLAINTIFF into falsely reporting the death of a boy.  If DEFENDANT OVERSTREET sent these messages and posts or conspired with others to do so, this came from Lexington County Missouri.  This will only be determined through discovery.

13LF-CV00461-Defendant-Overstreet-Motion-to-Dismiss

13LF-CV00461-Defendants-Motion-to-Dismiss-by-Overstreet-Response-by-Windsor-2013-06-28

13LF-CV00461-Defendant-Overstreet-Motion-to-Dismiss-Response-by-Windsor-Amended-2013-07-09

Woman who Bill Windsor asked to edit Allie Overstreet’s video records her opinions on Allie Overstreet’s lack of credibility

Virginia-Arlington-Meet-Me-in-DC-2013-02-05 096-Allie-Overstreet-cropped-640w

Woman who Bill Windsor asked to edit Allie Overstreet’s video records her opinions on Allie Overstreet’s lack of credibility

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU2q4eCFxh4&feature=share&list=UUYedsjTrVvv8q0QFFaGo4Gw

 

Bill Windsor files a Response to Defendant Allie Overstreet’s Notice of Hearing

Courtroom Gavel

Bill Windsor files a Response to Defendant Allie Overstreet’s Notice of Hearing.

RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF HEARING

OF DEFENDANT ALLIE OVERSTREET

Comes Now, William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or “Plaintiff”) and files this RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF HEARING OF DEFENDANT ALLIE OVERSTREET.  PLAINTIFF shows the Court as follows:

1.             On July 5, 2013 at 3:43 pm Central Time, PLAINTIFF received an email with a document titled “NOTICE OF HEARING” seeking to have a hearing at 11:00 am on July 16, 2013.

2.             But on July 16, 2013 at 11:00 am, a hearing will be held in Division 1 of the 15th Judicial Circuit Court in Lafayette County, Missouri, Judge Dennis Rolf, presiding on the PLAINTIFF’s motions, and no others.  The PLAINTIFF anticipates that the allotted time will be needed for his motions.

3.             This hearing was scheduled by the PLAINTIFF three weeks in advance because the rules and procedures in this Court require that a party first call the Clerk of the Court to determine when the judge will be available.  A date and time are then given, and then the party issues a Notice of Hearing.

4.             Neither DEFENDANT ALLIE OVERSTREET nor attorney Matthew O’Connor called the Clerk of the Court to request a date and time for a hearing, as the Clerk told the PLAINTIFF is required.  The Clerk was on vacation.  DEFENDANT ALLIE OVERSTREET should not be allowed to break the rules yet again, deny the PLAINTIFF his rights, and interfere with the long-scheduled hearing.

5.             Local Rule 21.2 requires that attorneys file an Entry of Appearance.  No such Entry of Appearance has been served on the PLAINTIFF, and no such Entry of Appearance is shown on the Court Docket.

6.             Pursuant to Local Rule 21.2, PLAINTIFF asks that all filings purportedly on behalf of DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET by Matthew J. O’Connor or the O’Connor Law Firm be stricken due to the fact that Matthew J. O’Connor and the O’Connor Law Firm failed to file an appearance and cannot be recognized by this Court.

7.             WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF prays that this Court strike the NOTICE OF HEARING and enter an order denying DEFENDANT ALLIE OVERSTREET’s request for a hearing until she sets her own hearing date as is required by the rules and the procedures of this Court; and grant such other relief as the Court deems appropriate.

 

Submitted this 7th day of July, 2013,

_________________________

William M. Windsor

514 America’s Way #4841

Box Elder, SD 57719-7600

Email: nobodies@att.net

Phone: 770-578-1094

Fax: 770-234-4106

13LF-CV00461-Defendant-Overstreet-Notice-for-Hearing-Response-2013-07-07

Bill Windsor files preliminary response to Defendant Mark Supanich’s Motion for Hearing

Courtroom Gavel

Bill Windsor files preliminary response to Defendant Mark Supanich’s Motion for Hearing.

PRELIMINARY RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF HEARING

AND MOTION OF DEFENDANT MARK SUPANICH

Comes Now, William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or “Plaintiff”) and files this PRELIMINARY RESPONSE TO MOTION AND NOTICE OF HEARING OF DEFENDANT MARK SUPANICH.  PLAINTIFF shows the Court as follows:

  1. 1.             On July 7, 2013 at 8:49 pm Central Time, PLAINTIFF received an email with a document titled “MOTION AND NOTICE OF HEARING.”
  2. The Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure provide 30 days to respond to a motion, and the PLAINTIFF is being denied that time should this MOTION be heard on July 16, 2013.
  3. 3.             On July 16, 2013 at 11:00 am, a hearing will be held in Division 1 of the 15th Judicial Circuit Court in Lafayette County, Missouri, Judge Dennis Rolf, presiding.  This hearing is on the PLAINTIFF’s motions, and no others.  The PLAINTIFF anticipates that the allotted time will be needed for his motions.
  4. This hearing was scheduled by the PLAINTIFF three weeks in advance because the rules and procedures in this Court require that a party first call the Clerk of the Court to determine when the judge will be available.  A date and time are then given, and then the party issues a Notice of Hearing.
  5. DEFENDANT MARK SUPANICH did not call the Clerk of the Court to request a date and time for a hearing, as the Clerk told the PLAINTIFF is required.  DEFENDANT MARK SUPANICH should not be allowed to break the rules, deny the PLAINTIFF his rights, and interfere with the long-scheduled hearing.
  6. WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF prays that this Court enter an order granting denying consideration of DEFENDANT MARK SUPANICH’s MOTION until the PLAINTIFF is given 30 days to respond; enter an order denying DEFENDANT MARK SUPANICH’s motions to be considered at a hearing until he set his own hearing date as is required by the rules and the procedures of this Court; and grant such other relief as the Court deems appropriate.

Submitted this 7th day of July, 2013,

_________________________

William M. Windsor

514 America’s Way #4841

Box Elder, SD 57719-7600

Email: nobodies@att.net

Phone: 770-578-1094

Fax: 770-234-4106

13LF-CV00461-Defendant-Supanich-Motion-for-Hearing-Response-2013-07-07

Bill Windsor files Amended Motion to Strike Pleadings of Allie Overstreet

Courtroom Gavel

Bill Windsor files Amended Motion to Strike Pleadings of Allie Overstreet.

AMENDED MOTION TO STRIKE PLEADINGS AND FILINGS

BY DEFENDANT ALLIE L. OVERSTREET

Comes Now, William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or “Plaintiff”) and files this AMENDED MOTION TO STRIKE PLEADINGS AND FILINGS BY DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET.  PLAINTIFF shows the Court as follows:

ATTORNEY DID NOT FILE AN ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

  1. 1.             On May 30, 2013, an attorney purportedly acting for DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET (“DEFENDANT”) filed a MOTION TO STRIKE PLEADINGS and a MOTION TO DISMISS AND INCORPORATED SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT.
  2. 2.             On June 3, 2013, an attorney purportedly acting for DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET (“DEFENDANT”) filed Certificates of Service of Discovery Responses.
  3. 3.             Local Rule 21.2 requires that attorneys file an Entry of Appearance.  No such Entry of Appearance has been served on the PLAINTIFF, and no such Entry of Appearance is shown on the Court Docket.
  4. 4.             Pursuant to Local Rule 21.2, PLAINTIFF asks that all filings purportedly on behalf of DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET by Matthew J. O’Connor or the O’Connor Law Firm be stricken due to the fact that Matthew J. O’Connor and the O’Connor Law Firm failed to file an appearance and cannot be recognized by this Court.

DEFENDANT FAILED TO ANSWER THE VERIFIED COMPLAINT

  1. The VERIFIED COMPLAINT was filed on April 29, 2013.
  2. On May 29, 2013, 2013, an attorney purportedly acting for DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET (“DEFENDANT”) filed what is titled as an ANSWER TO THE VERIFIED COMPLAINT.
  3. The so-called ANSWER TO THE VERIFIED COMPLAINT was neither filed by DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET nor an attorney who had filed an Entry of Appearance to represent her.  PLAINTIFF was never served with an Entry of Appearance, and the attorney who filed the so-called ANSWER did not respond to emails from the PLAINTIFF regarding discovery and other matters.

THE IMPROPERLY FILED ANSWER IS DISHONEST

  1. The so-called ANSWER could best be described as a despicable effort to circumvent the rules of civil procedure, defraud the Court, and deny justice to the PLAINTIFF.  The PLAINTIFF filed a VERIFIED COMPLAINT in which he swore that everything stated in the VERIFIED COMPLAINT was true and correct and based upon his personal knowledge.  It was signed under oath before a notary.  26 exhibits were attached, many of which the PLAINTIFF knows the DEFENDANT was familiar with.
  2. Yet, the so-called ANSWER to paragraphs 11, 12, 14-34, 38-57, 60, 63-72, 74, 76, 77, 79, 82, 84, 87-201, in the VERIFIED COMPLAINT was:  “Defendant states she is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations….”
  3. This dishonest so-called ANSWER includes facts sworn to by the PLAINTIFF for which the DEFENDANT definitely had knowledge and information, such as:
    1. 60.  After Meet Me in DC, Overstreet seemed to become obsessed with http://Joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com, a site directed at the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff considers to be a hate site.  Overstreet kept sending Facebook messages and emails about it to the Plaintiff.  While Overstreet was regularly sending the Plaintiff postings by haters, she wanted the Plaintiff to stop mentioning them
    2. 115.  Upon information and belief, Overstreet sent the death notice message to the Plaintiff or conspired with someone to send it.
    3. 119.  At approximately 3:00 am on February 23, 2013, a posting appeared on the Lawless America Facebook page from the account of Overstreet.  [A true and correct copy of this message reviewed by the Plaintiff is attached as Exhibit 521.]
    4. 141.  Overstreet responded with a message that was false.  [A true and correct copy of this message received by the Plaintiff is attached as Exhibit 509.]
    5. 143.   Overstreet continued to post false messages about the Plaintiff on Facebook.
    6. 144.  Overstreet lied numerous times in Facebook postings.
    7. 145.  At approximately 5:00 pm on Saturday, September 23, 2013, Overstreet posted this on the Lawless America Facebook page:  “That’s it? This is your big public ousting? A simple trace on the computer that sent that suicide message, would clear things up. Although I doubt that gets posted. Unblocking me so I can watch the train wreck, yet blocking me from commenting to defend myself is a bit juvenile I think.  Tell them, Bill, of the donations receipts. Tell them of the movie and Sundance fiasco. Tell them of the thousands of emails you copied me on. Tell them of the one where you are calling them stupid. Tell them of Homeland Security list Bill, and the filming at the capitol. Tell them how Stacey did send your hard drives back and how you gave permission to use the banner and camera. Tell Dottie what you really think of her. Tell them about Montana and the cops chasing you out of the state. Tell them how many social security numbers you have. Tell them about your database Bill. Tell them about the emails you DONT publish. Tell them about the tv show Bill. Tell them of your bad guy list and why they are on it . Tell them how many times you were in your basement when you you said you were on the road. Tell them about the death threats, or rather, the lack there of. Tell them about the trademark and copywrites Bill. Tell them how you sent me every email you ever sent any of them. Tell them about the meetings with movie agents. Go ahead, tell them. Tell them about your precious spreadsheets with all their personal info Bill. And while you are at it, tell them how to track IP’s and proxy’s, and how you never should have trusted a woman with brains enough to keep everything you ever said. …You have made a grave mistake jerking innocent people around for your own midlife crisis. Haters aren’t causing you to fail, YOU are causing you to fail. Lying about stupid shit trying to ruin peoples name, just because they dared to not bow correctly to you. Go ahead, trace the computer. I dare you. Tell them where all these criminal charges you have filed are. Tell them that you knew two weeks before DC we couldnt film in the capitol and that no legislators were coming. Tell them about the two under cover FBI agents in the Senate theater Bill. Tell them how you changed from a regular room to the biggest suite the Crowne had. Tell them how you told me there wont be any movement and you are going to back out. Tell them the timing in which this suicide message appeared. Neh…..you won’t do that, now will ya. Tell them how many letters you have written to congress Bill. Tell them who actually wrote them . Tell them who does all your work for you. Tell them why your son won’t associate his company with Lawless. Tell them how you didn’t renember Noah until I told you who he was. Tell them who got Stop the Silence to endorse you. Who got Washington Families United to endorse you. Who got you conference calls with media. Tell them how you forgoymt to copywrite Lawless and asked me what to do. Tell them how you have tens of thousands of unanswered emails. Tell them who did what Bill. I do dare you to sue me and file charges on me. I cannot wait. I will expose the real corruption within Lawless America gladly, and not on faacebook to a bunch of people who believe in you. I hope you do go to the cops, but I know you won’t because they already know you well. You are the sick one, for not giving a shit about these peoples stories unless it is good PR for you. You are good at talking sweet but suck at covering your tracks. Bring it on Mr. Windsor, we will see where that suicide message came from and we will blow you wide open for all your lies and using these folks vulnerabilities to your advantage. I am not your average lemming and lying about me to publicly and maliciously discredit my name was a big mistake.” [A true and correct copy of this message is attached as Exhibit 531.]
    8. 191.  When you compare several of Overstreet’s Posts, it seems to show that her strategy with this death notice scam is to claim that the Plaintiff posted knowingly false information.
    9. 192.  Overstreet has posted a harassing, libelous, slanderous Facebook post in which she says Windsor is a liar and “make[s] shit up.
    10. 195.  Overstreet has posted a harassing, libelous, slanderous Facebook post in which she says the Plaintiff duped people.
    11. 197.  Overstreet has posted a harassing, damaging Facebook posting in which she encouraged people to leave Lawless America.
    12. These, and other paragraphs in the VERIFIED COMPLAINT, are all matters that DEFEDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET has sufficient knowledge and information to answer.
    13. DEFEDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET denied eight of the 195 paragraphs in the VERIFIED COMPLAINT that the PLAINTIFF swore were true and correct based upon his personal knowledge.

DEFENDANT FAILED TO RESPOND TO INTERROGATORIES

  1. On May 7, 2013, PLAINTIFF served PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET.  On May 7, 2013, PLAINTIFF sent the Certificate of Service to the Clerk of the Court for filing.
  2. On June 3, 2013, the PLAINTIFF received what is purported to be “ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET.”  But these so-called “ANSWERS” were not filed by the DEFENDANT nor were they filed by an attorney with an Entry of Appearance on file with the Court.  Therefore, there is no response to the PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET.
  3. Furthermore, even if these so-called “ANSWERS” were considered to be properly filed, there are no answers.  DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET did not answer a single interrogatory.
  4. The attorney who filed the so-called ANSWERS has ignored the PLAINTIFF’S emails about the discovery problems.
  5. The PLAINTIFF has filed a MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET, referenced and incorporated herein as if attached hereto.
  6. Pursuant to Rule 61.01, PLAINTIFF asks that the pleadings of DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET be stricken due to a failure to respond to interrogatories.

DEFENDANT FAILED TO RESPOND TO DOCUMENT REQUESTS

  1. Pursuant to Rule 61.01, PLAINTIFF asks that the pleadings of DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET be stricken due to a failure to respond to requests for production of documents.
  2. The PLAINTIFF has filed a MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET, referenced and incorporated herein as if attached hereto.
  3. WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF prays that this Court enter an order granting this MOTION TO STRIKE PLEADINGS AND FILINGS BY DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET; and grant such other relief as the Court deems appropriate.

Submitted this 7th day of July, 2013,

_________________________

William M. Windsor

514 America’s Way #4841

Box Elder, SD 57719-7600

Email: nobodies@att.net

Phone: 770-578-1094

Fax: 770-234-4106

13LF-CV00461-Plaintiffs-Motion-to-Strike-Pleadings-Amended-2013-07-07

Allie Overstreet is named to the Hall of Shame

hallofshame

Allie Overstreet gets named to the Hall of Shame published by Barbara Hartwell.

The Hall of Shame: Yes, it’s a hackneyed term, but it’s also the best description of the evil (and shameful) works of bad guys, which is why it has survived for decades.

So here it is, the Hall of Shame. This list includes all kinds, male and female, the living and the deceased (some of whom are identified as such), from every place on the spectrum –from aggressive, obnoxious, loud-mouthed busybodies and snoops, to child rapists and murderers.

On this list there are malicious liars, thieves, blackmailers, extortionists, sex perverts/predators, pederasts, psycho stalkers, porno-mongers, human slave traffickers, identity thieves, COINTELPRO operatives and their minions, CIA, FBI, NSA (etc. etc.) agents, mind control handlers, perpetrators of eugenics, voodoo “scientists”, black magicians/occultists, anti-Christs, false prophets, demons masquerading as angels of light, cowards, traitors, U.S. Constitution-shredders, corrupt cops and government officials, slanderers, forgers, plagiarists, drug traffickers, common criminals, career criminals, war criminals, predicate felons, misogynists/male supremacists, racists/bigots, animal abusers, satanists, pedophiles, leftists, collectivists, socialists, communists, fascists, Nazis, Bolsheviks, globalist totalitarians, purveyors of disinformation, invaders of privacy, New Age nincompoops, secular humanist psycho-babblers, social engineers, psychopaths (and other assorted whackjobs), gun-grabbers, scamsters, hucksters, mountebanks, snake-oil salesmen, swindlers, charlatans, con artists, government stooges, minions and shills.
I have not included any of the titles, credentials, military rank or “letters” some of these characters use (either legitimately or as fraud); for my purposes here they are irrelevant.   Some are notorious wrongdoers; some I’m sure you’ve never heard of.  You see, it doesn’t really matter to me who they are, or why they are engaged in wrongdoing or crimes.  I am an “equal opportunity” expositor. Some of these individuals are exposed in detailed reports on this website.

From where I stand, it’s all about exposing INJUSTICE, as well as seeking JUSTICE for the Targets and Victims, who suffer as a direct result of the aggression by these wrongdoers. The individuals named here have participated –one way or another– in aggressive actions which violate the unalienable rights and liberties of others. The point is, they should all be held accountable for the wrongs they have done, the lies they have told, the false information they have disseminated, the crimes they have committed, the attacks on their Targets and Victims.

Also despicable is the promotion of bad guys to the detriment of truth-tellers and legitimate whistleblowers and expositors of corruption.  It’s not only a general matter of principle, but to me, also very personal. And when these perps unjustly attack my friends and allies, they are by extension attacking me.