Tag Archives: Civil Litigation

Bill Windsor files Amended Notice of Hearing in civil litigation against Allie Overstreet and Mark Supanich

Courtroom Gavel

Bill Windsor files Amended Notice of Hearing in civil litigation against Allie Overstreet and Mark Supanich.

NOTICE OF HEARING – AMENDED

Comes Now, William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or “Plaintiff”) and files this NOTICE OF HEARING – AMENDED.  PLAINTIFF shows the Court as follows:

  1. 1.             On July 16, 2013 at 11:00 am, a hearing will be held in Division 1 of the 15th Judicial Circuit Court in Lafayette County, Missouri, Judge Dennis Rolf, presiding.
  2. This hearing will be on the PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FILINGS BY DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ORDER CLERK OF THE COURT TO ISSUE SIGNED SUBPOENAS, and PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLEADNGS AND FILINGS BY DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET.
  3. This hearing will also include:
    1. MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF BRENDA WILLIAMSON AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO NOTICE OF AMENDED PLEADINGS
    2. MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET
    3. AMENDED MOTION TO STRIKE PLEADINGS AND FILINGS BY DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET
    4. MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET

Submitted this 7th day of July, 2013,

_________________________

William M. Windsor

514 America’s Way #4841, Box Elder, SD 57719-7600

Email: nobodies@att.net, Phone: 770-578-1094, Fax: 770-234-4106

13LF-CV00461-Plaintiffs-Notice-of-Hearing-Amended-2013-07-07

Bill Windsor files Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Motion for Sanctions against Defendant Allie Overstreet

Courtroom Gavel

Bill Windsor files Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Motion for Sanctions against Defendant Allie Overstreet.

MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES

AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

AGAINST DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET

Comes Now, William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or “Plaintiff”) and files this MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET.  PLAINTIFF shows the Court as follows:

  1. 1.             DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET is a serial liar who, among other things, swore to Judge John Frerking that the PLAINTIFF had published repeatedly that he intended to be a mass murderer or serial killer and that she was one of the intended victims.  This was all an outrageous lie and a crime.  There was never any such thing published or communicated in any manner, and Judge John Frerking dismissed the complaint after giving the DEFENDANT numerous opportunities to produce some evidence.  DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET is a serial liar who has published things about the PLAINTIFF that would be almost impossible to believe…but the PLAINTIFF has the evidence.  DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET has continued her serial lies in so-called discovery responses.
  2.  On May 7, 2013, PLAINTIFF served PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET.  On May 7, 2013, PLAINTIFF sent the Certificate of Service to the Clerk of the Court for filing.
  3. On June 3, 2013, the PLAINTIFF received what is purported to be “ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET.”  But these so-called “ANSWERS” were not filed by the DEFENDANT nor were they filed by an attorney with an Entry of Appearance on file with the Court.  Therefore, there is no response to the PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET.  Exhibit A hereto is a true and correct copy of the so-called RESPONSE.
  4. Furthermore, even if these so-called “ANSWERS” were considered to be properly filed, there are no answers.  DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET did not answer a single interrogatory.
  5. The attorney who filed the so-called ANSWERS has ignored the PLAINTIFF’S emails about the discovery problems.
  6. PLAINTIFF asks that DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET be compelled to provide detailed responses to Interrogatories 1-30 within seven days.
  7. 7.             PLAINTIFF asks that all filings by or purportedly on behalf of DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET be stricken.
  8. It is clear to the PLAINTIFF that DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET has responded to discovery and the VERIFIED COMPLAINT by thumbing her nose at the rules, the law, and this Court.  She gave false answers in her ANSWER.  She failed to answer any of the interrogatories.  She produced a pile of paper with no explanation as to what was what, much of which was not unaltered documents.  And, most serious, she has completely failed to produce significant evidence that she must have.  The PLAINTIFF suspects that she has deleted much evidence, but he is quite certain that she still has emails and other information that will be damning to her position in this matter.
  9. WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF prays that this Court enter an order granting this MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET and issue an order to:
    1. strike all pleadings and filings made by or on behalf of DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET;
    2. compel DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET to provide detailed answers to Interrogatories 1-30 within seven days.
    3. and grant such other relief as the Court deems appropriate;

Submitted this 7th day of July, 2013,

_________________________

William M. Windsor

514 America’s Way #4841

Box Elder, SD 57719-7600

Email: nobodies@att.net

Phone: 770-578-1094

Fax: 770-234-4106

13LF-CV00461-Plaintiffs-Motion-to-Compel-Interrogatories-Overstreet-2013-07-07

Bill Windsor files Second Request for Production of Documents by Allie Overstreet

CONTROL

Bill Windsor files Second Request for Production of Documents by Allie Overstreet.

Bill Windsor wants to have a forensic examination of Allie Overstreet’s computers and cellphones.  This will identify files that have not been produced or have been deleted.

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

 

Plaintiff William M. Windsor (“Windsor”) requests that Defendant Allie Loraine Yager Overstreet (“Overstreet”) produce for inspection and copying on August 5, 2013 at 1:00 pm at Holiday Inn Express Suites, 19901 E Valley View Pky, Independence, MO 64057 (or at such other place as may be agreed upon), the following in the manner required by law.

1.                  Overstreet is to produce all computers, cellphones, iPads, or other electronic devices used by Overstreet in 2011, 2012, and 2013.  The hard drives will be analyzed by Missouri Computer Forensics Associates (“Forensic Analyst”), and copies will be made of data found and recovered.  It may be possible for the Forensic Analyst to conduct some of this work remotely, so Windsor will have the Forensic Analyst contact Overstreet to make the arrangements that will work best for all concerned.

Submitted this 3rd day of July, 2013,

 

William M. Windsor

 

_________________________

William M. Windsor

514 America’s Way #4841

Box Elder, SD 57719-7600

Email: nobodies@att.net

Phone: 770-578-1094

Fax: 770-234-4106

13LF-CV00461-Plaintiffs-Request-for-Documents-Second-2013-07-03

Bill Windsor files Motion for Dismissal without Prejudice of Brenda Williamson

Courtroom Gavel

Bill Windsor files Motion for Dismissal without Prejudice of Brenda Williamson.

MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF BRENDA WILLIAMSON AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO NOTICE OF AMENDED PLEADINGS

Comes Now, William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or “Plaintiff”) and files this MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF BRENDA WILLIAMSON AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO NOTICE OF AMENDED PLEADINGS.  PLAINTIFF shows the Court as follows:

  1. 1.             The pro se PLAINTIFF has researched Missouri law to the best of his ability and has been unable to find a case to indicate if the PLAINTIFF’S proposed Amended Pleadings filed on July 2, 2013 is sufficient to remove Brenda Williamson as a party.  Therefore, the PLAINTIFF files this alternative motion in hopes that one or the other will be sufficient to effect this change.
  2. 2.             PLAINTIFF has been unable to locate DEFENDANT BRENDA WILLIAMSON.  The address that she gave the PLAINTIFF is invalid.  She has refused to provide her address upon request.  Online searches have revealed numerous addresses, but none of them seem to be valid.  A skip trace service is yet to determine what her current address is.
  3. The PLAINTIFF’s position in 13LF-CV00461 is being jeopardized because the Clerk of the Court will not issue subpoenas required for discovery by claiming that non-party subpoenas will not be issued until all parties have been served.
  4. Therefore, the PLAINTIFF feels that he has no option but to dismiss DEFENDANT BRENDA WILLIAMSON without prejudice so he may add her as a party in the future when she is located.
  5. The PLAINTIFF will continue to attempt to identify her address, and he will seek to have her added as a party at a later date.
  6. WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF prays that this Court enter an order granting this MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF BRENDA WILLIAMSON AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO NOTICE OF AMENDED PLEADINGS; dismiss Brenda Williamson as a Defendant without prejudice so the PLAINTIFF may add her as a party once she is located; and grant such other relief as the Court deems appropriate.

Submitted this 3rd day of July, 2013,

William M. Windsor

_________________________

William M. Windsor

514 America’s Way #4841

Box Elder, SD 57719-7600

Email: nobodies@att.net

Phone: 770-578-1094

Fax: 770-234-4106

13LF-CV00461-Plaintiffs-Motion-for-Dismissal-Brenda-Williamson-2013-07-03-2

Bill Windsor serves Allie Overstreet with Notice of Deposition to be held July 14-15, 2013

Virginia-Arlington-Meet-Me-in-DC-2013-02-06 336-Allie-Overstreet-cropped

Bill Windsor serves Allie Overstreet with Notice of Deposition to be held July 14-15, 2013.

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF

DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET

Comes Now, William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or “Plaintiff”) and files this NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET (“DEFENDANT”).

  1. YOU ARE NOTIFIED that on July 14, 2013, at 1:00 pm, PLAINTIFF will take the oral deposition of DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET in this action, at Cross Reporting Services, located at 306 SE 291 Highway, Suite 5, Lee’s Summit, Missouri 64086. The deposition will continue from day to day until completed.
  2. Deponent is required to produce at the deposition the materials described in Exhibit A attached to this notice and incorporated by reference.
  3. William M. Windsor, Lawless America, 514 America’s Way #4841, Box Elder, SD 57719-7600 will be the recording technician.

3.             The PLAINTIFF intends to record the deposition stenographically, and by audio and video tape.

5.             The Proof of Service attached to this notice contains a list of the parties on whom this notice has been served.

Submitted this 2nd day of July, 2013,

William M. Windsor

_________________________

William M. Windsor

514 America’s Way #4841

Box Elder, SD 57719-7600

Email: nobodies@att.net

Phone: 770-578-1094

These are the document requests:

13LF-CV00461-Plaintiffs-Deposition-Document-Requests-Overstreet-2013-07-02

Bill Windsor files Notice of Amended Pleadings

Courtroom Gavel

Bill Windsor files Notice of Amended Pleadings.

NOTICE OF AMENDED PLEADINGS

Comes Now, William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or “Plaintiff”) and files this NOTICE OF AMENDED PLEADINGS.  PLAINTIFF shows the Court as follows:

  1. 1.             PLAINTIFF has been unable to locate DEFENDANT BRENDA WILLIAMSON.  The address that she gave the PLAINTIFF is invalid.  She has refused to provide her address upon request.  Online searches have revealed numerous addresses, but none of them seem to be valid.  A skip trace service is yet to determine what her current address is.
  2. The PLAINTIFF’s position in 13LF-CV00461 is being jeopardized because the Clerk of the Court will not issue subpoenas required for discovery by claiming that non-party subpoenas will not be issued until all parties have been served.
  3. Therefore, the PLAINTIFF feels that he has no option but to amend his pleadings to remove DEFENDANT BRENDA WILLIAMSON.
  4. The PLAINTIFF will continue to attempt to identify her address, and he will seek to have her added as a party at a later date.
  5. Supreme Court Rule 55.33 provides that “A pleading may be amended once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served….”
  6. DEFENDANT BRENDA WILLIAMSON has not filed a responsive pleading, so this Notice of Amended Pleadings does not require a motion or approval of the Court.
  7. PLAINTIFF has effected this removal by amending pages 1, 3, and 13.  These amended pages are attached hereto as Exhibit A.  All other pages remain the same.

Submitted this 2nd day of July, 2013,

William M. Windsor

_________________________

William M. Windsor

514 America’s Way #4841

Box Elder, SD 57719-7600

Email: nobodies@att.net

Phone: 770-578-1094

13LF-CV00461-Plaintiffs-Notice-of-Amended-Pleadings-2013-07-02

Fax: 770-234-4106